Search this article on Google: What are the key provisions of Canadian Immigration Law that potential migrants should be aware of?
Title: Unraveling Canadian Immigration Law: Key Provisions and Insights
Canada is a land of vast opportunities, offering an impressive quality of life that continues to attract immigrants from all corners of the globe. The nation’s immigration policy is governed by the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and its regulations. As legal experts in LexLords Canada Immigration Lawyers, we offer insights into some of the key provisions that potential migrants should be cognizant of.
1. Selection Criteria for Permanent Residency:
The IRPA system prioritizes three main classes of immigrants; economic, family, and refugees. The point-based evaluation system primarily assesses the economic class on a number of factors such as age, education, language proficiency, work experience, and adaptability. For example, in the case of “Raza v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2007 FC 49”, it was ruled that immigration officers are obligated to utilize up-to-date labour market information to make an accurate assessment of a potential immigrant’s ability to become economically established in Canada.
2. Family Class Sponsorship:
Under section 133 of the Regulations, Canadian citizens or permanent residents can sponsor certain categories of relatives for Permanent Residence. This includes spouses, dependent children, parents and grandparents. However, sponsors are required to meet certain income thresholds and must agree to financially support their sponsored relatives for a period of time.
In the case “Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65”, the judgments underscored that sponsors have a significant obligation towards their relatives and the Canadian government. They can be held liable for any social assistance drawn by their sponsored relatives during the period of undertaking.
3. Refugee Protection:
The Act provides protection to individuals who have a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group (as per section 96 and 97). However, claims can be denied if individuals are deemed inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human rights, or criminality.
A landmark case in this realm is the “Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Singh,  1 S.C.R. 177”, where the Supreme Court of Canada asserted that refugee claimants in Canada have the constitutional right to an oral hearing.
Under IRPA section 34-42, certain candidates could be deemed inadmissible to Canada for reasons such as security, human or international rights violation, criminality, health grounds, financial reasons, misrepresentation, or non-compliance with the Act.
The case “Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 SCC 51” was a significant ruling regarding inadmissibility due to criminality. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a foreign national’s criminal record can render them ineligible for Permanent Residence, even if their crime was committed outside of Canada.
In compliance with IRPA sections 44-53, those contravening immigration laws may face removal orders, especially when they pose a risk to the safety of Canadian citizens or residents.
Understanding and navigating Canadian immigration law can be complex as it is built around numerous intricate provisions. LexLords Canada Immigration Lawyers always recommend seeking professional guidance to ensure proper understanding and adherence to these laws. As legal experts with years of experience, we believe these insights will aid potential migrants in their journey toward becoming Canadians.