Defamation trial finds Rebel Wilson claiming she was bullied by Amanda Ghost rather than orchestrating producer‑targeted websites

In a courtroom that has become a stage for the Hollywood habit of turning personal grievances into public litigation, Rebel Wilson took the stand at the ongoing defamation trial to assert, with an air of solemn certainty, that she had no involvement whatsoever in the creation or management of the websites that allegedly targeted producer Charlotte MacInnes, a claim that has already prompted observers to wonder whether the legal drama merely mirrors the industry’s penchant for digital smear campaigns.

Wilson’s testimony, delivered in a measured yet unmistakably defensive tone, emphasized that any notion of her engineering or funding the said sites was not only false but also contradicts the fact that, at the time the attacks were purportedly launched, she found herself on the receiving end of bullying by music executive Amanda Ghost, a circumstance she presented as a plausible explanation for why she would not have been horrified by the existence of such platforms and would instead have been preoccupied with her own personal distress.

The plaintiff, identified as Charlotte MacInnes, the Australian lead actress of the musical‑comedy film The Deb, has sued Wilson for defamation on the grounds that the online content in question damaged her professional reputation, an allegation that places the dispute within the broader context of a legal system increasingly called upon to adjudicate the murky intersection of celebrity, social media, and reputational harm.

Beyond the immediate drama of the courtroom exchange, the case underscores a persistent systemic paradox in the entertainment industry, wherein the very mechanisms designed to protect public figures from slander are often invoked by those same figures to shield themselves from genuine accountability for the digital harassment tactics they are accused of employing, thereby illuminating a predictable pattern of institutional inconsistency that the litigation process appears ill‑equipped to resolve.

Published: April 28, 2026